Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 16839 of 2025 Court No. - 39 HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J.
HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J.
1. Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client is senior citizen. There was order dated 24th June, 2024 made by respondent no.3 under section 24 of UP Revenue Code, 2006. He seeks direction upon respondent no.2 (the District Magistrate) to discharge duty under rule 21 of Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Rules, 2014. To that end his client made application dated 15th May, 2025 to said respondent. 2. On query Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh submits, private respondent nos.4 and 5 are his client's neighbours. They are harassing him. 3. On earlier occasion, on behalf of State it was submitted that petitioner has to obtain enforcement of aforesaid order dated 24th June, 2024. Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh submits, the demarcation was marked with stones. Private respondents removed the demarcation. It was once again made and removed. It is then his client moved aforesaid application dated 15th May, 2025 to the District Magistrate. 4. Paragraphs 4 and 5 from order dated 8th July, 2025 are reproduced below. "4. Object of Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 is to provide relief to senior citizens including parents against the children or relative, as the case may be. Private respondent nos.4 and 5 are neither. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sunil Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Swarath .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. Parties will be further heard on adjourned date."
5. Today, Mr. Tiwari, learned advocate, Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State submits, petitioner has to find his remedy by lodging complaint for registration of FIR and under section 23 of UP Revenue Code, 2006. 6. On the facts and in the circumstances, the writ petition is not maintainable on view taken by a Division Bench of this Court, in which one of us (Arindam Sinha, J.) was party on judgment dated 16th July, 2025 in Writ C no.18408 of 2025 (Ishak Vs. State of U.P.) reported in [2025 (7) ADJ 594 (DB). Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. The dismissal, however, will not prevent petitioner from finding his remedy in the manner as has been submitted on behalf of State and recorded above.
October 13, 2025 Salim WRIC No. 16839 of 2025 2
(Arindam Sinha,J.)
(Satya Veer Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SALIM PRAVEJ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad