Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62552 (KAR)

SMT KAVERI W/O SHRIKANT PATIL v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/100092/2025 · 2025-10-30

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14744 WP No. 100092 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 100092 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: SMT. KAVERI W/O SHRIKANT PATIL, AGE. 23 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O: SIDDAPUR, TQ. JAMKHANDI, DIST. BAGALKOT - 587 301. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAHUL S. KUNTOJI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, R/BY THE PSI TOWN POLICE STATION JAMKHANDI, DIST. BAGALKOT - 587 301. 2. SRIKANTH S/O VIKRAM PATIL, AGE. 35 YEARS, OCC. GOVT. EMPLOYEE, R/O. GORAVAGUNDAGI, TQ. SINDAGI, DIST. VIJAYAPURA - 586 128. 3. VIKRAM S/O PANDURANG PATIL AGE. MAJOR, OCC. NOT KNOWN, R/O. GORAVAGUNDAGI, TQ. SINDAGI, DIST. VIJAYAPURA - 586 128. 4. SMT. SIDAMMA W/O VIKRAM PATIL AGE. MAJOR, OCC. NOT KNOWN, R/O. GORAVAGUNDAGI, TQ. SINDAGI, DIST. VIJAYAPURA - 586 128. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS PRAYING TO ISSUE A Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14744 WP No. 100092 of 2025 WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO. 01 TO REGISTER THE COMPLAINT MADE BY THE PETITIONER ON 23-10-2024 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) This Court by order dated 26.09.2025 had passed the following order: “Three weeks’ time granted finally to comply with the office objections. If the office objections are not complied by 27.10.2025, relist on 30.10.2025 for dismissal.” Despite the directions issued by this Court, the office objections have not been complied till date. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE kmv CT-GTB