NAUVENDRA SINGH SON OF SHRI RAMESH CHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/2142/2025 · 2025-02-21
Sameer Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6254 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6254 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:8040] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2142/2025 Nauvendra Singh Son Of Shri Ramesh Chand, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of 03, Railay Station, Sukha Sila, Bandh Baretha, Bayana, District Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Energy Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Jaipur Vidhyut Vitaran Nigam Limited, Jaipur Through Its Managing Director, Vidhut Bhawan, Jan Path, Jaipur.
3. Chief Personnel Officer I, Jaipur Vidhyut Vitaran Nigam Limited, Vidhut Bhawan, Jan Path, Jaipur.
4. Assistant Engineer (O And M), Jaipur Discom, Bayana, District Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dilip Singh Kurka with Mr. Trilok Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shailesh Prakash Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 21/02/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the instant matter is squarely covered by the judgment dated 14.02.2025 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2938/2024 titled as Shrawan Kumar Vs. JVVNL.
Learned counsel for the respondents has assured that the representation filed by the petitioner will be adjudicated within an upper period of 30 days.
[2025:RJ-JP:8040] (2 of 2) [CW-2142/2025] Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances, with the consent of respective sides, this Court deems it apposite to dispose of the present petition with the direction to the respondents to adjudicate the representation, filed within a period of 7 days from the passing of this order, in accordance with law, by way of speaking order, within a period of 15 days thereafter. The interim protection granted herein, shall remain operative till the adjudication of representation. It is made clear that, any observation of this Court, will not prejudice the process qua adjudication of representation on the part of the respondents. In view of the above, the instant petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/s-415