Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62539 (KAR)

SHRI GOOLAPPA S/O SANNABASAPPA SABRAD v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/105358/2025 · 2025-08-13

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10234 WP No. 105358 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 105358 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SHRI GOOLAPPA S/O SANNABASAPPA SABRAD AGE 60 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O KALLI ONI BAYIRIDEVARKOPPA TQ: HUBBALLI, DIST:DHARWAD …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B V SOMAPUR, & SMT. N.B. SOMAPUR., ADVOCATES) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DHARWAD DIST DHARWAD-580001. 2. THE TAHSHILDAR HUBBALLI TQ: HUBBALLI, DIST: DHARWAD-580001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T. HANUMAREDDY., AGA FOR R1 & R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED. 02/05/2025 AND 23/5/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND B, AND ENTER THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN THE RECORDS OF THE SUIT PROPERTY AND ETC. GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.08.19 15:27:50 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10234 WP No. 105358 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. Learned AGA accepts notice for Respondents No.1 and 2. 2. The Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent No.2 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 02.05.2025 and 23.5.2025 vide Annexure-A & B, and enter the name of the petitioner in the records of the suit property. b. Issue such any other writ/order/direction as this Hon’ble Court deems fit. 3. The grievance of the Petitioner is that the application which has been submitted for mutating the name of the Petitioner in the revenue records in respect of the land in Sy.No.198 of Bayiridevarkoppa village, subsequent to the death of his father, has not been acted upon. Subsequently, representations dated 2.5.2025 and 23.5.2025 at Annexures-A and B have also been submitted, which were not yet considered. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10234 WP No. 105358 of 2025 4. Whenever any representation has been submitted by a citizen to any authority, it is required that the said Representation to be acted upon and necessary orders to be passed, either accepting or rejecting the Representation submitted in accordance with law. Needless to say, if an order of rejection is passed, the same would have to be accompanied by reasons. Neither having been done, I pass the following: ORDER i) The Writ petition is allowed. ii) A mandamus is issued directing Respondent No.2 to consider the representations of the Petitioner dated 2.5.2025 and 23.5.2025 at Annexures-A and B within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE PRS List No.: 3 Sl No.: 57