Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010057062004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
SECOND APPEAL NO: 879/2004
Between:
Medisetti Janakamma and Others
...APPELLANT(S) AND
Neelam Venkayamma
...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1.
N (P) ANJANA DEVI SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent:
1.
JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO The Court made the following Judgment:
This Court after perusing the earlier proceedings gave a direction on 04.03.2025, to list the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. However, today also, there is no representation for the appellants.
2
2. Learned counsel for the respondent is in attendance.
3. In that view of the matter, this Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_____________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 27.03.2025 PSA
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
SECOND APPEAL NO: 879 of 2004
Date: 27.03.2025 PSA