GOVIND S/O BABU KUBIHAL v. SMT RAJESHWARI W/O GOVIND KUBIHAL
RPFC/100203/2025 · 2025-12-05
C M Joshi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 62515 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 62515 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17331 RPFC No. 100203 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO.100203 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
GOVIND S/O. BABU KUBIHAL, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, R/AT. JANATA PLOT, KELGERI, DHARWAD. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. UMESH P. HAKKARAKI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. RAJESHWARI W/O. GOVIND KUBIHAL, AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/AT. WADDAR ONI, MANJUNATH NAGAR, DESHPANDE NAGAR, 2ND MAIN ROAD, HUBBALLI-580029.
2.
KUMAR SAMARTH S/O. GOVIND KUBIHAL, AGE: 6 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT,
3.
KUMAR SANCHIT S/O. GOVIND KUBIHAL, AGE: 5 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT,
SINCE BOTH ARE MINOR R/BY. MINOR GUARDIAN NATURAL MOTHER, SMT. RAJESHWARI W/O. GOVIND KUBIHAL, AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/AT. WADDAR ONI, MANJUNATH NAGAR, DESHPANDE NAGAR, 2ND MAIN ROAD, HUBBALLI-580029. …RESPONDENTS
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF FAMILY COURT’S ACT 1984, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 13.11.2025 PASSED BY THE I ADDL. PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, HUBBALLI IN CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS NO.432/2024 AND ETC.
YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Digitally signed by YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Date: 2025.12.09 14:59:44 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17331 RPFC No. 100203 of 2025
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI)
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the revision petition, which reads as under: MEMO
“The undersigned seeks leave of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the aforesaid petition with a liberty to file writ petition, in the interest of justice and equity.”
2. No reasons are being assigned for liberty being sought. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. All questions are kept open.
3. In view of disposal of the petition, pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and are disposed of accordingly.
SD/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE
RKM, CT:PA