Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62514 (ALL)

PREMPAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/17748/2025 · 2025-05-27

Prakash Padia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:91212 Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 17748 of 2025 Petitioner :- Prempal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Pal Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Krishna Kant Singh Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. 1. Heard Sri Ram Pal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondent and Sri Krishna Kant Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 3/Village Pradhan. 2. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is a complainant, he made a complaint against the Village Pradhan as provided under section 95(1)(g) of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act before the respondent no. 2/District Magistrate, District Kasganj on 02.01.2025 which is supported by an affidavit. It is further argued that considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no final decision has been taken in the matter. 3. On the other hand, it is argued by learned Standing Counsel that the respondent No.2 will take a decision in the matter expeditiously. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of directing the respondent No.2/District Magistrate, District Kasganj to look into the complaint made by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders expeditiously. 6. Needless to say that respondent no. 2 will pass orders strictly in accordance with law after providing opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned, unless there is no legal impediment. Order Date :- 28.5.2025 Arti Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad