IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 3256 OF 2025 Between: Smt. Pabbati Mallika,W/o. P. Janardhan Reddy, Aged about 35 years, Occ; Field Supervisor through APD, R/o. Parnapalli Grama Panchyat, Bandi Atmakur Mandal, Nandyal District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Project Director, District Water Management Board, Nandyal Distirct. 3. The Additional Project Director, Parnapalli Grama Panchayat, Bandi Atmakur Mandal, Nandyal District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction may more particularly one in the nature of MANDAMUS, declaring the impugned removal orders of the 2'"'^ respondent vide Rc.No.C.76/HRM/FA/2022, dated 28.06.2023 in removing the petitioner as Field Supervisor of Parnapalli Grama Panchayat, Bandi Atmakur Mandal, Nandyal District only by succumbing to political pressures without furnishing copies of the alleged complaints, enquiry reports contrary to the specific directions 4^^ passed in W.P No. 8546/2023, dated 10.04.2023 disposed in terms of orders.passed in W.P No. 36663/2022 86 batch, dated 23.11.2022 in gross violation of principles of natural justice by way of colorable exercise of power in violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of The Constitution of India and consequently set aside the aforesaid impugned removal orders, dated 02.08.2023. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service as Field Supervisor of Parnapalli Grama Panchayat, Bandi Atmakur Mandal, Nandyal District by suspending the impugned removal orders of the 2 respondent vide Rc.No.C.76/HRM/FA/2022, dated 28.06.2023. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. NAGA PHANINDRA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI S.RAJU, ASST.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3: SRI M.S.R.CHANDRA MURTHY, SC FOR ZPP, MPP 7 GRAM PANCHAYT The Court made the following: ORDER nd r APHC010057592025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 02^ [3331] MONDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 3256/2025 Between: Smt. Pabbati Mallika ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KNAGA PHANINDRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Impugning the proceedings issued Rc.No.C.76/HRM/FA/2022 dated 28.06.2023 by respondent No.2 vide removing the petitioner from service as Field Supervisor of Parnapalli Grama Panchayat, Bandi Atmakur Mandal, Nandyal District, the above writ petition is filed. 2. Heard Sri K. Naga Phanindra, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri S. Raju, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.1 and Sri M.S.R. Chandra Murthy, learned standing counsel for the respondents 2 and 3. W.P.No.3256of 20. % 3. At the hearing, when the Court pointed out the petitioner’s approach to ^ the Court, after a long period, without filing a statutory appeal as per Field Assistant Human Resource Policy, 2013 (for short ‘FAHRP’), learned for the petitioner sought leave of the Court to file appeal before the appellate authority, against the orders impugned in this writ petition. 4. Given the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, without touching the merits of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, with the consent of learned counsel on either side, giving liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the appellate authority FAHRP. If such an appeal is filed, the learned appellate authority shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders strictly as per the Rules. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. counsel as per SD/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ' SECHOf^ OFFICER To. 1. The Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj & Rural Development Department, State of Andhra Pradesh Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District, 2. The Project Director, District Water Management Board Distirct. 3. The Additional Project Director, Parnapalli Grama Panchayat Atmakur Mandal, Nandyal District. 4. One CC to Sri K.Naga Phanindra, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj & Rural Dev, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 6. One CC to Sri M.S.R.Chandra Murthy, SC forZPP Panchayat. [OPUC] 7. Three CD Copies. Nandyal Bandi MPP & Gram gi HIGH COURT DATED: 10/02/2025 ORDER ^ 0 1 MAR 2025 & Current Secuon Sij>esPATCV5^ Co/ WP.No.3256 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS