SUMANT KUSHWAHA v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/17428/2025 · 2025-07-02
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 62480 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 62480 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:103517 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 17428 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sumant Kushwaha Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Prakash Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
1. Petitioner before this Court is a complainant. He has moved a complaint against the respondent no. 4 under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction for recovering compensation from respondent no. 4.
2. It appears to be a personal litigation by the petitioner against the respondent no. 4. Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot be used as a tool to settle personal score. I have gone through the material on record and no case for interference is made out. It is a malicious proceeding initiated by petitioner against the respondent no. 4.
3. Writ petition is misconceived and dismissed, accordingly, with cost of Rs. 25,000/-. Order Date :- 3.7.2025 Shekhar Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad