Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6248 (PNJ)

MOHINDER KUMAR v. HANS KUMAR

RSA/1674/2001 · 2026-02-12

Deepak Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Mohinder Kumar Hans Kumar CORAM: Present: DEEPAK GUPTA for the appellant as to whether he has been able to establish contact with the appellant or has not been issued, as the appellant previous order dated 09.07.2025. Having failed to furnish latest, complete and updated address of the respondent, it a appellant is no appellant to get it revived in case any cause of action survives. 12.02.2026 Vimal IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1674 Date of Decision: Mohinder Kumar Versus Hans Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Mr. Neeraj Mann, Advocate, for Mr. Sachin Mittal, Advocate, for the appellant. DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (Oral) There is no information on the part of the learned counsel for the appellant as to whether he has been able to establish contact with the appellant or not. It is further noticed that the has not been issued, as the appellant has failed to make compliance of the previous order dated 09.07.2025. Having failed to furnish latest, complete and updated address of the respondent, it a appellant is no longer interested in pursuing the instant appeal. Dismissed in default for non prosecution appellant to get it revived in case any cause of action survives. 12.02.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1674-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.02.2026 …Appellant ...Respondents DEEPAK GUPTA Mann, Advocate, for Mr. Sachin Mittal, Advocate, for the appellant. There is no information on the part of the learned counsel for the appellant as to whether he has been able to establish contact with not. It is further noticed that the notice to the respondent has failed to make compliance of the previous order dated 09.07.2025. Having failed to furnish latest, complete and updated address of the respondent, it appears that the longer interested in pursuing the instant appeal. Dismissed in default for non prosecution with liberty to the appellant to get it revived in case any cause of action survives. (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No There is no information on the part of the learned counsel for the appellant as to whether he has been able to establish contact with notice to the respondent has failed to make compliance of the previous order dated 09.07.2025. Having failed to furnish latest, ppears that the with liberty to the VIMAL KUMAR 2026.02.13 13:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document