Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6247 (JHR)

PAIGAM ALI @ PAIGAM ALI ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1414/2025 · 2025-03-04

Anil Kumar Choudhary

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1414 of 2025 ------ Paigam Ali @ Paigam Ali Ansari, aged about 47 years, Son of Nasir Ansari, R/o Kurmidih, Chhotpichri, P.O. Kalyanpur, P.S. Dhanbad, Dist.-Dhanbad .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Lukesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vijoy Kumar Sinha, Addl. P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 04-03-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Barwadda P.S. Case No.188 of 2024 instituted under sections 420, 406, 504 and 506 of the I.P.C, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has cheated and committed criminal breach of trust and taken Rs.8,00,000/- from the informant but did not return the same. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is submitted that the dispute between the parties is basically civil dispute. It is then submitted that the alleged agreement dated 28.04.2015 is a forged and fabricated one, as the signature of the petitioner has been forged in the said alleged agreement, by the informant and on the basis of the said forged document, the present case has been lodged. It is next submitted that there is no any document to show entrustment of any money to the petitioner. It is further submitted that there is a delay of nine years in filing of the present case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Barwadda P.S. Case No.188 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile numbers during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Rohit/