( 2025:HHC:9540 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Arbitration Case No.25 of 2025 Decided on: 7th April, 2025 Satyawati .......Petitioner Versus The Divisional Commissioner and others. ...Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner: Mr. Rajiv Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Sharmila Patial, Addl. A.G for respondents No.1 and 4. Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3. Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral) OMP No.68 of 2025 The application is allowed and disposed of. Arb. Case No.25 of 2025 Notice. Ms. Sharmila Patial, learned Additional Advocate General and Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 4, respectively. 2. The instant petition has been filed under Section 29-a (4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for extension of time of the mandate of the Arbitrator. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. ( 2025:HHC:9540 ) 2 3. From the averments made in the petition, I am fully satisfied that the petitioner has been pursuing her case honestly, diligently and sincerely by taking all necessary and requisite steps for the progress of the case and has not sought any un-necessary adjournments. 4. Therefore, in the given facts and circumstances, the petition for extension of time deserves to be allowed. 5. Accordingly, the petition is allowed and the time limit for completing the arbitration proceedings in Arbitration Reference Case No. 102 of 2016, in case titled as Satyawati vs. National Highway Authority of India and others, pending before the learned Divisional Commissioner-cum-Arbitrator, Shimla, District Shimla, H.P. is extended by a period of six months and the Arbitrator shall now ensure that the proceedings are completed by passing an award by or before 31.10.2025. April 07, 2025 ( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) (naveen) Judge