MANJAPPA S/O BHIMAPPA DASANNANAVAR v. THE PRESIDENT
WP/107565/2023 · 2025-10-30
M Nagaprasanna
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 62408 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 62408 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14743 WP No. 107565 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 107565 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
MANJAPPA S/O BHIMAPPA DASANNANAVAR, AGE. 44 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. DIDAGUR VILLAGE, TQ. AND DIST. HAVERI- 581148. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIJAYENDRA BHIMAKKANAVAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE PRESIDENT SENIOR CITIZENS MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE BOARD HAVERI, ALSO THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, HAVERI, SUB-DIVISION HAVERI, DIST. HAVERI- 581110.
2.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SENIOR CITIZEN MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE BOARD, ALSO THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HAVERI, HAVERI, DIST. HAVERI- 581110.
3.
SMT. DYAMAVVA CLAIMING TO BE WIFE BHIMAPPA DASANNANAVAR, AGE. CLAIMING TO BE 70 YEARS, OCC. NIL, R/O. HEDIGONDA VILLAGE, TQ. BYADAGI, DIST. HAVERI- 581110 …RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLEs 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS PRAYING TO ISSUE
Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14743 WP No. 107565 of 2023
WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER VIDE ANNEXURE - B DATED 17.07.2023 BEARING NO.MAG (He.Naa) AP: 14/2022-23 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND THEREBY THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 DATED 02.01.2023 IN MAG (He.Naa) AP.14/2022-23 BEFORE THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IS LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED AS NOT MAINTAINABLE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)
This Court by order dated 24.09.2025 had passed the following order:
“Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has partly complied with the office objections. Registry is directed to verify. If compliance has not been made, re-list the matter on 30.10.2025 for dismissal of the petition.” Despite the directions issued by this Court, the office objections have not been complied till date. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
Kmv CT-GTB