Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62406 (BOM)

DHARMENDRA S/O CHINDHUJI THAKRE v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO PS KELWAD, DISTRICT NAGPUR

ABA/657/2025 · 2025-12-10

Vrushali V Joshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 6.aba.657.25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 657/2025 Dharmendra s/o. Chindhuji Thakre Vs. State of Maharashtra - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. M. I. Dhatrak, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Ujjwal Phasate, A.P.P. for the Non-applicant/State. CORAM : MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI,J. DATED : 10/12/2025. . Heard. 2. The applicant has apprehension of arrest in Crime No.334 of 2025 for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 409, 467, 468, 471 r/w. Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The applicant is the gram sevak. The allegations are made against the applicant and the co-accused that they sold the government land to third person, on the basis of assessment made by the gram sevak. The learned Counsel for the applicant has stated that the assessment was made by the gram sevak for the tax purpose. It can not be considered for any sale deed. This is for fiscal purpose. Considering the role played by this applicant as a gram sevak, prayed to confirm the interim protection granted on 04.09.2025. 4. The learned Counsel for the applicant further stated that as per the conditions imposed by this Court, the applicant is attending the concerned Police Station. 5. The learned A.P.P. has stated that the custody of this applicant is required as the assessment made is missing. 2025:BHC-NAG:13980 2 6.aba.657.25 6. For that purpose the applicant is attending the Police Station and he is available for further investigation. The custodial interrogation of this applicant is not required. Hence, the interim protection granted on 04.09.2025 is confirmed on the same terms and conditions. 7. The applicant to attend the concerned Police Station till filing of the charge-sheet. (MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) RGurnule