COCP No.1884 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 134 M/S V K CONSTRUCTION Vs DIWAKAR PARSAD TEWARI AND ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Present: Ms. Veena Hooda for the petitioner. Mr. Rohit Khann, Advocate for respondent No.1 (through video Mr. Rishi Kaushal, Advocate for respondent No.2. HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for passed by the Writ Court, representation submitted by the petitioner already stand dealt with vide communication dated 27.06.2024. 2. In view of above, no cause survives in the instant pe stands disposed of, however, the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail appropriate remedies, in accordance with law. 3. Rule stands discharged. May 12, 2025 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2023 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1884 of 2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: M/S V K CONSTRUCTION DIWAKAR PARSAD TEWARI AND ANR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Ms. Veena Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rohit Khann, Advocate for respondent No.1 (through video Mr. Rishi Kaushal, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that in terms of order passed by the Writ Court, representation submitted by the petitioner already stand dealt with vide communication dated 27.06.2024. In view of above, no cause survives in the instant pe stands disposed of, however, the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail appropriate remedies, in accordance with law. Rule stands discharged. (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1884 of 2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.05.2025 ......Petitioner ....Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA for respondent No.1 (through video-conferencing). respondent No.2 submits that in terms of order passed by the Writ Court, representation submitted by the petitioner already stand dealt with vide communication dated 27.06.2024. In view of above, no cause survives in the instant petition. The same stands disposed of, however, the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail appropriate (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 1 respondent No.2 submits that in terms of order passed by the Writ Court, representation submitted by the petitioner already stands tition. The same stands disposed of, however, the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail appropriate MOHMED ATIK 2025.05.12 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment