IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54378 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-510 Year-2021 Thana- SAHARSA SADAR District- Saharsa ====================================================== 1. Lalan Kumar @ Lao yadav @ Lalo Kumar @ Lalu Son of Kusheshwar yadav Village -Pasupalan Chowk Ward No 2 Ps -Saharsa Sadar District -Saharsa 2. Sundari Devi @ Sundri Devi wife of Suren yadav Village - Saraswati nagar, Ward No 2 Ps -Saharsa Sadar District -Saharsa 3. Reena Kumari @ Rina Kumari Daughter of Suren Yadav Village - Saraswati nagar, Ward No 2 Ps -Saharsa Sadar District -Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhisek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anant Kumar 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 21-08-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 447, 448, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are women. It is next submitted that police after threadbare investigation came to a considered conclusion that petitioners are innocent and submitted Final Form No. 819 of 2022 dated 23.10.2022 exonerating the petitioners of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, but then the learned Magistrate differing with the police report took cognizance, as such, petitioners apprehend Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54378 of 2025(2) dt.21-08-2025 2/2 arrest. The learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that once an Investigating Agency after threadbare investigation came to a considered conclusion that petitioners are innocent whether it would be prudent for the Court to send the petitioners to jail based on an order of cognizance which came to be taken based on the same police report which exonerated the petitioners of the allegations. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 510 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS. Rishabh/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T