Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62382 (KAR)

SRI PRAVEENKUMAR S S/O BASAPP S v. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

WP/102612/2025 · 2025-12-01

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16827 WP No. 102612 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 102612 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. PRAVEENKUMAR S. S/O. BASAPP S., AGE: 45 YEAARS, OCC: GUEST LECTURER, 1133/43 BEHIND KEB OFFICE, 1ST WARD RAMANAGARA – 2, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI (P AND T), VIJAYANAGARA (D) 583212. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. N. MULIMANI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, M. S. BUILDING, BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION UNNATHA SHIKSHNA SOUDHA, SESHADRI ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 001. 3. THE JOINT DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, REGIONAL OFFICE, MINI VIDHAN SOUDHA, DHARWAD – 560 001. 4. THE PRINCIPAL, GVPPGFG GOVT FIRST GRADE COLLEGE, HGARIBOMMANAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA – 583 212. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. GIRIJA S. HIREMATH, HCGP FOR RESPONDENT/STATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER NATURE OF WRIT DIRECTING THE RESP NO. 2 TO PASS AN ORDER TO ALLOW THE PETITIONER TO CONTINUE HIS SERVICE IN THE RESPONDENT 3 COLLEGE TILL END VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.12.02 11:53:11 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16827 WP No. 102612 of 2025 OF THIS ACADEMIC YEAR 2024-25 IN VIEW OF THE PROVISION MENTIONED AT 18A AND B OF THE CIRCULAR NO. KA SHI E/ NEVI-1/A U AA/90. 2023-24 DATED 3-10-2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-B AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned HCGP appearing for the respondent-State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition has become infructuous. 3. According to said submission, petition stands disposed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE KGK/CT-ASC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 36