Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62379 (KAR)

HUKKERI TALUK SAMAGRA GRAMEENA v. THE SUPERINTENDENT

WP/100791/2025 · 2025-09-19

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12682 WP No. 100791 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 100791 OF 2025 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: HUKKERI TALUK SAMAGRA GRAMEENA ABHIVRUDHI SANGHA, TQ. HUKKERI, DIST. BELAGAVI, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY MAHESH S/O. LAKKAPPA GUMACHI, AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS AND AGRICULTURE, R/O. SHIVASHANKARA COMPLEX, HUKKERI, DIST. BELAGAVI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. N.R. KUPPELUR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT MANAS KENDRA KANAGAV, BELAGAVI, DIST. BELAGAVI-590001. 2. THE DISTRICT DISABILITILES AND WELFARE OFFICER, WELFARE DEPARTMENT BELAGAVI, SHIVAJI NAGAR, BELAGAVI, DIST. BELAGAVI-590001. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR THE WOMENS AND CHILDREN’S WELFARE DEPARTMENT, BELAGAVI, DIST. BELAGAVI-590001. Digitally signed by SAROJA HANGARAKI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12682 WP No. 100791 of 2025 4. SRI. RAM AGENCIES REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPERITOR SRI. SANJEEV S/O. SHIVAPURAPPA BISIROTTI AGE. 42 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, BELAGAVI, DIST. BELAGAVI-590001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A) TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT DATED 26.11.2024 IN NOTIFICATION NO.2024- 25 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 AS PER ANNEXURE-G. B) A WRIT OF MANDAMUS THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO RE EVALUATE THE COMMERCIAL BID IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW TO SELECT THE LOWEST BIDDER IN TERMS OF THE TENDER CONDITIONS NO.9. C) TO GRANT SUCH OTHER ORDER OR RELIEF TO WHICH THE PETITIONER MAY BE FOUND ENTITLED TO UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned endorsement dated 26.11.2024 in notification no.2024-25 issued by the respondent no.1 as per Annexure-G. b. A writ of mandamus the respondent No.1 to re evaluate the commercial bid in accordance - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12682 WP No. 100791 of 2025 with law to select the lowest bidder in terms of the tender conditions No.9. c. To grant such other order or relief to which the petitioner may be found entitled to under the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the petition has rendered infructuous. Memo reads as under: “The undersigned advocate for the petitioner respectfully submits that the petitioner filed the above petition being aggrieved by the endorsement dated 26.11.2024. Since the Tender proceedings in pursuance of the endorsement dated 26.11.2024, have been already finalized and completed for the financial year 2024-2025, the above petition becomes infructuous. Hence this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to take the memo on record and permit the petitioner to withdraw the petition having become infructuous, in the interest of justice.” 3. Memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SH Ct:pa List No.: 3 Sl No.: 77