DR. SHRISTI PURWAR AND ANOTHER v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/7249/2025 · 2025-07-13
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 62374 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 62374 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:112458 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7249 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dr. Shristi Purwar And Another Respondent :- The Union Of India And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shivendu Ojha,Sneh Pandey,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Anoop Tiwari,Diptiman Singh Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following prayers:-
"(a) A writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondents-Authorities not to interfere in peaceful functioning of the Petitioners and also to permit the Petitioners to continue with their services as Resource Persons in Centre of Fashion Design and Technology of the Institute of Professional Studies of the University of Allahabad and to make payment of salary as and when it comes due. (b) A writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondents-Authorities to regularize/ absorb the services of the Petitioners on the post of Assistant Professor/ Associate Professor/Professor in the Centre of Fashion Design and Technology of the Institute of Professional Studies of the University of Allahabad and also to provide all other consequential benefits to the Petitioners as admissible under law."
2. Heard Sri Radha Kant Ojha, learned senior counsel assisted by Sri Shivendu Ojha, counsel for the petitioner and Sri Diptiman Singh, learned counsel for the respondents no.2 to 4 and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 3. After some argument, Sri Radha Kant Ojha, learned senior counsel submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to represent his case by filing fresh representation. 4. Sri Diptiman Singh, learned counsel for the respondents no.2 to 4 vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned counsel for the respondents no.2 to 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a fresh detailed representation along with the present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.2, the University of Allahabad through its Registrar within one week from today.
After receiving the said representation, respondent no.2 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 14.7.2025 Asha (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad