Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62361 (KAR)

THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER v. SRI PARASAPPA S/O FAKIRAPPA PAGAD

WP/103630/2023 · 2025-09-24

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13066 WP No. 103630 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 103630 OF 2023 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN: THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER NWKRTC, GADAG DIVISION GADAG-582101 …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SUNITHA P.KALASOOR, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. PARASAPPA S/O FAKIRAPPA PAGAD, AGE. 46 YEARS, OCC. DRIVER, R/O. AT POST. MELAKOTE, TQ. TUMKUR, DIST. TUMKUR, PIN CODE-571431. …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, A) CALL FOR RECORDS IN ID NO.214/2016 DATED 01.08.2022 PASSED BY THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, HUBBALLI AT HUBBALLI. B) QUASH THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 01.08.2022 IN ID NO.214/2016 PASSED BY THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, HUBBALLI AT HUBBALLI, PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,. Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13066 WP No. 103630 of 2023 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. Despite the order dated 10.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with. 2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE AM CT: UMD List No.: 3 Sl No.: 7