Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62357 (ALL)

SATISH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/17781/2025 · 2025-07-14

Samit Gopal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:113573 Court No. - 64 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 17781 of 2025 Applicant :- Satish Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Krishna Murari Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Arvind Singh,G.A. Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J. 1. List revised. 2. Vakalatnama of Sri Arvind Singh, learned counsel for the first informant is not on record despite his name being printed in the cause list. Office to trace out the same and place it on record and make a note in the order sheet regarding the same. 3. Heard Sri Krishna Murari Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Arvind Singh, learned counsel for the first informant and Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State. 4. This bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the applicant-Satish Kumar, seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No.0038 of 2025, u/s 64(2)(m) of BNS and 67 I.T. Act, P.S. Kone, District Sonbhadra. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that charge sheet in the matter has been submitted after filing of the present bail application and some more Sections have been added. He submits that the present bail application be dismissed as not pressed as he shall seek appropriate remedy available under law so that the added Sections are also taken care of while filing of the bail application. 6. Prayer is allowed. 7. The present bail application is dismissed as not pressed. 8. Office to return the certified copy of the FIR and free copy of the bail rejection order to learned counsel for the applicant as per rules. (Samit Gopal, J.) Order Date :- 15.7.2025 Gaurav Kuls Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad