IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49672 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-468 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Patna ====================================================== Sujit Kumar S/o Yogendra Yadav R/o- Sundarpur, P.S.- Katrisarai, Distt.- Nalanda (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Akash Shankar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Mushtaque Alam, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 07-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 112(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the IT Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, acting on a tip off, police raided a flat of the apartment and seized 13 mobile phones, 10 SIM cards, 1 laptop, 9 ATM cards, 3 Aadhar cards, 1 keyboard, 1 Mouse, 2 Chargers, 1 AC Remote and 1 printer and arrested one Ranjan Kumar. Said Ranjan Kumar disclosed that co-accused Nitish Yadav @ Manish used to post misleading advertisement on Facebook for providing loans through ‘Dhani App’. Processing money received by loan seekers were being allegedly deposited into bank accounts of other accused persons. Said Ranjan Kumar disclosed name of this petitioner as his Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49672 of 2025(2) dt.07-08-2025 2/2 associate in the Cyber Fraud case. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case on suspicion. Learned counsel submits that save and except confessional statement, there is no other direct or indirect evidence against the petitioner to show his complicity in the occurrence. No victim of cyber crime, has made any allegation against the petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. 5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. He submits that there is allegation against the petitioner hat he along with other accused persons was indulged in committing cyber crime. 6. Considering the nature and gravity of allegation, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. shashi/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U