IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76504 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2021 Thana- BHEJA District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1. Jaishankar Yadav @ Jaishankar Kumar Yadav S/o- Ganesh Yadav R/o village- Koriyadhant, P.S.- Bheja, Distt.- Madhubani 2. Ganesh Yadav S/o- Late Matuki Yadav R/o village- Koriyadhant, P.S.- Bheja, Distt.- Madhubani 3. Umesh Yadav @ Umesh Kumar Yadav S/o- Late Matuki Yadav R/o village- Koriyadhant, P.S.- Bheja, Distt.- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 77611 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2021 Thana- BHEJA District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1. Rameshwar Yadav Son of Late Banbari Yadav R/o Village- Koriyadhant, P.S.- Bheja, District.- Madhubani 2. Bhupendra Yadav @ mupedra yadav son of Rameshwar Yadav R/o Village- Koriyadhant, P.S.- Bheja, District.- Madhubani 3. Arjun Yadav son of Mahaveer Yadav R/o Village- Koriyadhant, P.S.- Bheja, District.- Madhubani 4. Muneshwar yadav Son of Late Mahtab yadav R/o Village- Koriyadhant, P.S.- Bheja, District.- Madhubani 5. Ashok Yadav Son of Late Matuki Yadav R/o Village- Koriyadhant, P.S.- Bheja, District.- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 76504 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dewanand Tiwari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 77611 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dewanand Tiwari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4 05-05-2026 Heard the parties. 2. Both these cases arise from the same P.S. case and therefore they are being heard together and are being disposed Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76504 of 2025(4) dt.05-05-2026 2/3 of by this common order. 3. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Bheja P.S. Case No. 53 of 2021, corresponding to G.R. No. 1034/2021, registered for offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 4. As per prosecution case, due to land dispute, all the named accused persons assaulted the family members of the informant. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are quite innocent and have not committed any offence. He further submits that there are general and omnibus allegations against the petitioners of having assaulted the victim. There is case and counter case also in which one person has died from the side of the petitioners. A similarly situated co-accused person, namely, Agin Yadav @ Agin Kumar Yadav has already been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 24.02.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 2093 of 2026. 6. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. 7. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances of the case and the fact that the similarly situated co-accused person has been granted privilege of anticipatory bail, this Court Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76504 of 2025(4) dt.05-05-2026 3/3 is inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 8. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within four weeks from today, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bheja P.S. Case No. 53 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/ under section 482(2) of the BNSS. 9. It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner. Ranjeet/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T