DINESH PATEL v. STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECRETARY HOME UP AT LKO.
BAIL/17567/2025 · 2025-08-07
Avnish Saxena
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 62343 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 62343 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:134682 Court No. - 92 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 17567 of 2025 Applicant :- Dinesh Patel Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Through Secretary Home Up At Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Utsav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Avnish Saxena,J.
1. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant- accused Dinesh Patel for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) BNS and 66(C), 66 (D) IT Act in Case Crime No.35 of 2025, Police Station - Manjhanpur, District – Kaushambi. 2. Sri Utsav, learned advocate, appear for the applicant and submits that the accused applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The FIR has been registered by the informant Suman Lata with the allegations that her ATM card has been exchanged by some anonymous person in the ATM booth and Rs.82,000/- on different dates have been withdrawn. There is no cogent evidence collected by the Investigating Officer. The name of the accused-applicant has been figured from the statement of co-accused Purendra Shukla who has already been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court. The criminal history of nineteen cases have been explained in paragraph no.9 of the bail application. The accused-applicant is on bail in all the cases shown as criminal history. All the cases shown as criminal history have been levelled by the police personnel. The accused applicant is in jail since March, 2025. 3. Per contra, learned A.G.A. for the State has opposed the bail application and submits that the accused-applicant is a habitual offender. The CCTV footage of the ATM Booth has been taken out but the TNT has not been recorded. The charge sheet has been submitted. 4. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by the parties and perused the record. 5. The perusal of the record prima facie reveals that the FIR has been lodged against the unknown persons. The accused-applicant has been apprehended by the police on the basis of statement of co-accused Purendra Shukla who has already been granted bail. Criminal history has been explained. The accused-applicant is in jail since March, 2025. 6. Without touching the merit of the case, this bail application is allowed. 7.
Let the applicant-accused Dinesh Patel be enlarged on bail subject to furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. Order Date :- 8.8.2025 I.A.Siddiqui (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- IMRAN AHMAD SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad