Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6234 (CHH)

TILESHWARI NIRMALKAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPCR/74/2025 · 2025-02-05

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:6454-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 74 of 2025 1 - Tileshwari Nirmalkar W/o Late Ravi Kumar Nirmalkar Aged About 25 Years R/o Village And P.O. - Darba, Police Station - Birejhar, Tahsil- Kurud, District- Dhamtari (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Superintendent Of Police Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari (C.G.) 3 - The Station House Officer Police Station Magarlod, District- Dhamtari (C.G.) 4 - Manoj Dholakiya Aged About 51 Years, Proprietor Of Unique Traders (Electrical Contractor), City Kotwali Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravish Verma, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. S. Baghel, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 05.02.2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:- “That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ(s), order(s), direction(s) by giving direction(s)/ order(s) to the prosecution/ police authorities/ respondent 2 No 1 to 3 for completion of the investigation and enquiry as early as possible in FIR No. 181/2024 for further step as per Criminal Procedure Code against the accused persons is required to be taken and report be submitted before the competent trial Court. 2. That, this Hon’lbe Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief to the petitioner which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and appropriate as per the facts and circumstances of the present, in the interest of justice.” 2. At the time of hearing, this Court has observed that the relief which has been made in the present petition is defective one as there is no mention of the date on which the FIR has been registered nor the offences or the Police Station or the District has been mentioned. 3. In view of the above, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with the liberty to file a duly constituted petition. 4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty with a cost of Rs. 2000/- to be deposited in the account of Specialized Adoption Agency, Dhamtari (CG) within 7 days from today and furnish the receipt of the same before the registry of this Court. 5. Registry is directed to return back the certified copy of documents after retaining attested true copy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Sagrika SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.02.06 10:20:08 +0530