IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 212 CM-3815-LPA-2019 & CM-3816-LPA-2019 in/& LPA-1701-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.09.2025 POONAM CHAND AND ANR ...Appellants Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- None for the applicant-appellants. ***** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) 1. There is a delay of 27 days in filing and 44 days in re-filing of the present appeal. Even the said delay has not been condoned after a period of six years. 2. No one has appeared on behalf of the applicant-appellants. Hence, it can safely be presumed that the applicant-appellants are not interested to pursue the present application for condonation of delay. 3. Dismissed for non-prosecution 4. Subsequently, the appeal is also dismissed being time barred. ( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) JUDGE ( VIKAS SURI ) September 09, 2025 JUDGE harish Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No HARISH KUMAR 2025.09.11 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment