Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62318 (PNJ)

YUVRAJ v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/5358/2025 · 2025-05-22

Manisha Batra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-5358 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND 152 Yuvraj State of Haryana CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Present:- MANISHA BATRA, J. 1. 226 of the Constitution of India Superintendent of Police, petitioner from the hands of respondents No. 3 to 6. 2. reveals that the petitioner was working as Sanitary Inspector in Hisar in the year 2020 but he was demoted to a lower post. His claim is that he is being harassed and tortured by respondents Department concerned. On going through the entire petition and after hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, petitioner is having threat from aforesaid respondents, warranting i of this Court. Rather, it seems that the petitioner has some grievances relating to his salary, leave, reduction in direction can be issued to respondent No. 2. has not been able to make out even a prima facie case that the petitioner has 5358-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Mr. Siddharth, Advocate for the petitioner. MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to respondent No. 2 Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner from the hands of respondents No. 3 to 6. A perusal of the petition, which is in fact very poorly drafted, reveals that the petitioner was working as Sanitary Inspector in Hisar in the year 2020 but he was demoted to a lower post. His claim is that he is being harassed and tortured by respondents No. 3 to 6, who are the Officers of the Department concerned. On going through the entire petition and after hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing has come out as to how the petitioner is having threat from aforesaid respondents, warranting i of this Court. Rather, it seems that the petitioner has some grievances relating to his salary, leave, reduction in official post etc., for which of course, no direction can be issued to respondent No. 2. not been able to make out even a prima facie case that the petitioner has -1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-5358-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.05.2025 ...Petitioner Versus ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article seeking direction to respondent No. 2 Yamuna Nagar to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner from the hands of respondents No. 3 to 6. A perusal of the petition, which is in fact very poorly drafted, reveals that the petitioner was working as Sanitary Inspector in Hisar in the year 2020 but he was demoted to a lower post. His claim is that he is being No. 3 to 6, who are the Officers of the Department concerned. On going through the entire petition and after hearing nothing has come out as to how the petitioner is having threat from aforesaid respondents, warranting interference of this Court. Rather, it seems that the petitioner has some grievances relating official post etc., for which of course, no direction can be issued to respondent No. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner not been able to make out even a prima facie case that the petitioner has 1- 2025 (O&M) 22.05.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondents Article seeking direction to respondent No. 2- Yamuna Nagar to protect the life and liberty of the A perusal of the petition, which is in fact very poorly drafted, reveals that the petitioner was working as Sanitary Inspector in Hisar in the year 2020 but he was demoted to a lower post. His claim is that he is being No. 3 to 6, who are the Officers of the Department concerned. On going through the entire petition and after hearing nothing has come out as to how the nterference of this Court. Rather, it seems that the petitioner has some grievances relating official post etc., for which of course, no Learned counsel for the petitioner not been able to make out even a prima facie case that the petitioner has MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.05.22 18:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-5358 any threat to his life and liberty from the said respondents. Accordingly, finding no merit in the petition, the same is dismissed. 22.05.2025 Waseem Ansari Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 5358-2025 (O&M) any threat to his life and liberty from the said respondents. Accordingly, finding no merit in the petition, the same is dismissed. 22.05.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -2 any threat to his life and liberty from the said respondents. Accordingly, finding no merit in the petition, the same is dismissed. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2- any threat to his life and liberty from the said respondents. Accordingly, MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.05.22 18:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document