2025:HHC:18721 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No. 36 of 2024 Decided on : 18.06.2025 Narain Singh. …Petitioner Versus Dr. Aman Deep Gar, IAS and others. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : M/s Prem Parkash Chauhan and Arushi Chauhan, Advocates For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General and Mr. Rajpal Thakur, Additional Advocate General Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though now an order has been passed conferring the work- charge status to the petitioner, post completion of eight years of service, with effect from 01.01.2007 but consequential benefits have not been paid to the petitioner. 2. Learned Advocate General submits that benefits as will be available to the petitioner, in terms of the judgment of the 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:18721 Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Surajmani’s case, will be released to him in due course. 3. Let needful be done, within a period of three months. With these observations, these proceedings are closed, but with liberty to the petitioner to seek revival thereof, by filing an appropriate application, if needful is not done within a period of three months from today and Registry shall not insist upon the application being accompanied by the affidavit of the petitioner. Notice discharged. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 18, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)