Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62297 (ALL)

ANSHU GIRI v. UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/16623/2025 · 2025-07-17

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:116713 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16623 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anshu Giri Respondent :- Union Of India And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anubhav Kumar Vats,Kuldeep Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Dhananjay Awasthi Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following relief:- "a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to correct the name of the petitioner as Anshu Giri which is wrongly printed as Anshu, the names of the parents of the petitioner as Krishna Giri, which is wrongly transcribed as Krishna and Geeta K.C., wrongly transcribed as Geeta and the date of birth, as 03-12-2006 which is also wrongly transcribed as 02-12-2006 in the High School Certificate-cum- Mark Sheet of the petitioner having Roll No. 23165012 and the registration no. R122/70511/0187." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no.4 and a direction may be issued to him to forward the same to Regional Officer M & M, Prayagraj and thereafter, the same may be decided in time bound manner. 3. Sri Dhananjay Awasthi, learned counsel appearing in advance accepted notice on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 3 vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Dhananjay Awasthi, learned counsel appearing in advance accepted notice on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 3, Sri R. P. Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner as no objection made by learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no.4 Principal, Oxford Public School, Senior Secondary, Gorakhpur, U.P. within 10 days. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no.4 is directed to forward the same to Regional Officer M & M, Prayagraj within two weeks and thereafter, the Regional Officer M & M, Prayagraj is directed to pass appropriate order after considering the documents sent by the schools in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 18.7.2025 AKT (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad