235 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-13403-2018 Date of Decision: January 20, 2025 Ashok Kumar (Re/red Inspector Nagar Panchayat, Bhikhi) … Appellant Versus State of Punjb and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None for the appellant. Mr. Surya Kumar, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Tarunjit S. Grewal, Advocate for respondent No.3. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) On the last date of hearing, following order was passed:- “There was no representaon on behalf of the peoner on 22.11.2023, when the maer was taken up for hearing. Even today also, posion is the same. Learned counsel for respondent No.3 submits that Nagar Councils- Gidderbaha, Mansa and Bucho are necessary pares to the lis as the peoner had earlier rendered services with those Municipal Councils. The said averments have been made in Paras 2 and 3 of the preliminary objecons. However, the peoner has not impleaded the said Municipal Councils as necessary party- respondents in the present peon. In the interest of jusce, adjourned to 20.01.2025. Copy of the order be served upon the counsel for the peoner. It is made clear that no further adjournment shall be granted on the next date of hearing.” Today again, the posi)on is same, inasmuch as there in no representa)on on behalf of the pe))oner. In the aforesaid, it is apparent that the pe))oner is no longer interested in pursuing this pe))on. Dismissed in default for want of prosecu)on. January 20, 2025 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Sarita Rani 2025.01.21 10:37 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order