COCP No.2013 of 202 IN TH 117 SURESH KUMA Vs KISHAN LAL A CORAM: HON' Present: Ms. J Mr. R Mr. Mr. P for re HARKESH MAN 1. By w Contempt of Cou alleged willful n passed by the Fin interim stay was g Courts below. 2. Lear that ROR No.34 has been finally d 3. In vi is disposed of, ho as per law. 4. Rul February 14, 20 Atik Whe Whe 2021 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No. Date of De UMAR AL AND ORS ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Ms. Jyoti Kaur, Advocate for Mr. R.D. Yadav, Advocate for the pe Mr. Himanshu Setia, Advocate for Mr. Prashant Singh Chuahan, Advoc for respondent Nos.3 and 5. **** MANUJA, J. (Oral) By way of present petition filed u f Courts Act, 1971, proceedings are llful non-compliance of the orders d Financial Commissioner (Revenue) was granted with respect to implemen Learned counsel representing respon o.34 of 2017-2018 titled ‘Suresh Ku ally decided and dismissed. In view of above, no cause survives of, however, with liberty to the petitio Rule stands discharged. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/N Whether reportable Yes/N UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH P No.2013 of 2021 (O&M) of Decision: 14.02.2025 ......Petitioner ....Respondent ESH MANUJA the petitioner. Advocate filed under Section 10 and 12 of th s are sought to be initiated against th ders dated 28.02.2018 and 18.08.202 venue) Haryana at Chandigarh, whereb plementation of the orders passed by th respondent Nos.3 and 5 has pointed o Kumar vs. Kishan Lal and other rvives in the present petition. The sam petitioner to avail appropriate remedie (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 1 of the inst the 08.2021 hereby d by the nted out others’ he same medies, MOHMED ATIK 2025.02.14 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment