SMT. BASAMMA L HOOLI v. STATE BY POLICE INSPECTOR,
WP/104456/2024 · 2025-01-31
Hemant Chandangoudar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6226 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6226 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:1986 WP No. 104456 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR WRIT PETITION NO. 104456 OF 2024 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SMT. BASAMMA L. HOOLI W/O. LAKSHAMAPPA HOOLI, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, WORKING AS CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER (OWN PAY SCALE), RON TALUK GADAG DISTRICT, (UNDER ORDERS OF SUSPENSION), R/AT KALLAPURA, SHIROL POST, NARAGUND TALUK, GADAG DIST-582207. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.B.BAJENTRI, SRI. VIJAY KUMAR AND SRI. OMKAR L.DESAI, ADVOCATES)
AND:
1.
STATE BY POLICE INSPECTOR KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA POLICE, GADAG-582010, GADAG DISTRICT.
2.
SRI. A.H.DADDI MAJOR, CIVIL AND SUPPLY CONTRACTOR, R/AT. 193-D, NEAR SHARANABASAVA, MATTEXTENSION AREA, BAGALKOT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SRINIVAS B.NAIK, SPP FOR R1;
NOTICE TO R2 IS SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO, TO CALL FOR RECORDS RELATING TO REGISTERING THE FIR IN CRIME NO.
4/2023, DATED 14.9.2022, ON THE FILE OF THE SPECIAL PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT GADAG, GADAG DISTRICT, (VIDE ANNEXURE-A), AND AFTER PERUSAL QUASH THE FIR IN CRIME NO. 4/2023 AND FURTHER PROCEEDINGS THEREON, IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
B K MAHENDRAKUMAR Digitally signed by B K MAHENDRAKUMAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.02.03 11:33:26 +0530
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:1986 WP No. 104456 of 2024
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter for sometime seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition reserving liberty to the petitioner to file a petition afresh in the event charge sheet is filed.
The said submission is placed on record.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty as sought for.
The statement of objection filed by the respondent No.1 – Lokayukta is placed on record.
Sd/- (HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE
BKM Ct:vh List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21