134 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA RAJINDER KAUR MR. KRISHAN KUMAR AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Shivam Kapila, Advocate for Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. HARKESH MANUJA Learned State counsel on instructions from Mr. Nalin Yadav, IFS, DFO, Hoshiarpur submits that all consequential benefits in relation to regularization of petitioner in terms of 2011 policy w.e.f. 2019 shall be released to her within 4 weeks from today. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, aforementioned period at liberty to seek revival the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of Rs.50,000/- as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of t towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. 10.02.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: RAJINDER KAUR Versus MR. KRISHAN KUMAR AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Shivam Kapila, Advocate for Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel on instructions from Mr. Nalin Yadav, IFS, DFO, Hoshiarpur submits that all consequential benefits in relation to regularization of petitioner in terms of 2011 policy w.e.f. 2019 shall be d to her within 4 weeks from today. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of t towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2169-2024 Date of Decision: February 10, 2025 ........Petitioner ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Shivam Kapila, Advocate for Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. Learned State counsel on instructions from Mr. Nalin Yadav, IFS, DFO, Hoshiarpur submits that all consequential benefits in relation to regularization of petitioner in terms of 2011 policy w.e.f. 2019 shall be In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner in case the needful is not done within the , as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 2024 February 10, 2025 Learned State counsel on instructions from Mr. Nalin Yadav, IFS, DFO, Hoshiarpur submits that all consequential benefits in relation to regularization of petitioner in terms of 2011 policy w.e.f. 2019 shall be In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner in case the needful is not done within the , as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of he petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.02.11 09:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document