AMAN SINGH ALIAS AMAN SHEKHAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./2763/2025 · 2025-07-25
Rajesh Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6224 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6224 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:20514
1 B.A. No. 2763 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2763 of 2025
Aman Singh @ Aman Shekhar Singh, aged about 27 years, S/o- Anil Kumar Singh, R/o- H. No. -11, Line No.1, Anand Nagar, Namda Basti, P.O. & P.S.- Golmuri, Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum
........Petitioner
Vrs.
The State of Jharkhand
.......... Opposite Party
…....
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Petitioner : MrVishal Kumar Trivedi, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P.
06/25.07.2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State.
2. The applicant who is in custody since 28.09.2022 has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T. No.17 of 2023 arising out of Golmuri P.S. Case No.118 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. No.2011 of 2022, registered for the offence under Sections 324/326/307/34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum.
3. It appears that earlier the prayer for bail of the applicant had been rejected twice i.e. in B.A. No. 2530 of 2023 vide order dated 25.07.2023 and in B.A. No. 2279 of 2024 vide order dated 25.04.2024 with a direction to the Trial court to expedite the trial and conclude the same within nine months from the date of rejection of bail.
4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
5. Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted that bullet has been fired by the co-accused namely Rohan Singh and out of twenty-eight charge-sheeted witnesses, seventeen witnesses have already been examined.
6.
Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.
7. Considering the role assigned to this applicant, the period of custody and the stage of the trial, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the applicant, named above, is directed to be
2025:JHHC:20514
2 B.A. No. 2763 of 2025
released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum in connection with S.T. No. 17 of 2023 arising out of Golmuri P.S. Case No.118 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. No.2011 of 2022, subject to condition that the applicant(s) will submit self-attested photocopy/photocopies of his/her/their Aadhaar Card(s) and also submit his/her/their mobile number(s) before the learned court below which he/she/they will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) A.Mohanty