Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62217 (ALL)

ARUN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/7506/2025 · 2025-07-13

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:112256 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7506 of 2025 Petitioner :- Arun Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Saurabh Singh,Suresh Kumar Maurya,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- Abhinava Krishna Srivastava,C.S.C.,Shyam Mani Shukla Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. Heard Sri Ashok Khare, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Suresh Kumar Maurya, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Abhinav Krishna Srivastava, learned counsel for respondents. 2. Petitioner has suffered with two disciplinary proceedings. In first disciplinary proceedings, he was suffered with a penalty of an adverse entry for a reason being a construction work was concluded after more than 2 years from its expected date of conclusion. 3. Learned Senior Advocate submits that petitioner has submitted reply to allegations, however, he has not able to dispute that petitioner has accepted that work in question was concluded on 02.11.2023 whereas its expected date was 07.12.2021, therefore, Court is of the opinion that on basis of facts of case and admission as well as that principles of natural justice were followed, hence, punishment of adverse entry is not liable to be interfered. 4. In second disciplinary proceedings, petitioner was put under suspension by an order dated 09.04.2025. 5. In this regard, learned counsel for respondents submits that charge sheet has been served on 23.05.2025 has been served upon petitioner. 6. Learned Senior Advocate for petitioner submits that he has no instructions about aforesaid fact, however, in such event, he will submit reply to charge sheet and prays that with cooperation of petitioner, disciplinary proceedings be concluded expeditiously. 7. Considering aforesaid submissions and that now charge sheet has been served upon petitioner, therefore, this writ petition is disposed of without interfering with impugned suspension order that same be concluded expeditiously with cooperation of petitioner and in case it is not concluded within 8 weeks from today, impugned suspension order dated 09.04.2025 shall be deemed to be kept in abeyance, subject to outcome of disciplinary proceedings. Order Date :- 14.7.2025 N. Sinha Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad