APHC010056772022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Or ■O' o V 73 MONDAY.THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER ^ ^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3680 OF 2022 Between: 1. Boddeda Seethayamma, W/o. Late Paradesinaidu Aged 60 years, Occ. Household R/o. D.NO. 1-7-37, BHPV Post, Peda Akkireddipalem, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam. 2. Boddeda Siva Apparao @ Babji, S/o.Late Pradesinaidu, Aged 51 years, R/ o Near Gowaramma Temple Sathakampattu, Gavarapalpm, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. 3. Bodeda Satyanarayana, S/o. Late Paradesinaidu Aged 47 years , R/o. D.No.1-7-37, BHPV Post, Pedda Akireddipalem, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam District. 4. Boddeda Nooka Srihari, S/o. Late Paradesinaidu Aged 40 years, R/o. D.o. 1-737, BHPV Post, Pedda Akkireddipale Visakhapatnam. Gajuwaka, ...Petitioners AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariate, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam District. 3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Anakapalli Sub-Division, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District. 4. The Station House Officer, Anakapalli police Station, Visakhapatnam District. 5. Sagi Gopala Rao, S/o. Venkata Satyanarayana, Aged 65 years, R/o. Door.No. 1-47-9/2, Sector-1, MVP Colony, Visakhapatnam-17. lyanampudi Sivayya, S/o. Venkata Suryanarayana, Aged 45 years, R/o. D.No. 6. 19-84, Visakhaptnam-47. Pandiri N V Vidhyasagar, S/o. Nageswara Rao, Aged 44 years, R/o. Door.No. 11-2-1, Sea Sheall Apartments, Flat No. G-14, Waltair Upplands, Visakhapatnam-3. Namburi Tulasidas, S/o. Lakshmanaswamy, Aged 49 years, Rio. D.No. 38-23-34, 0pp. R and B, NH-5, Marripalem, Visakhapatnam-18. Naiduthota, Vepagunta Saimadhavanagar, 7. 8. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.2 to 4 in not granting police protection to implement the permanent injunction granted in O.S.No.105 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District under Judgement and Decree dated 27.9.2019 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and to consequently direct the respondents No.2 to 4 to provide police protection for implementation Judgement and Decree dated 27.9.2019 passed in O.S.No.105 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District. lA NO: 1 OF 2027 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.2 to 4 to provide police protection to the property admeasuring Ac.5.00 cents in Sy.No.69 / 1, Sampathipuram Village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District covered by Judgment and Decree dated 27.9.2019 passed in O.S.No.105 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the Counter Affidavit copies on record by allowing the leave petition in the Writ Petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI V V SATISH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME (TG) Counsel for the Respondents No.5 to 8: SRI BALA MURALI KRISHNA P The Court made the following Order: APHC010056772022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3680/2022 Between: 1.BODDEDA SEETHAYAMMA, W/0. LATE PARADESINAIDU AGED 60 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD R/0. D.NO.1-7-37, BHPV POST, PEDAAKKIREDDIPALEM, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2.BODDEDA SIVA APPARAO @ BABJI, S/O.LATE PRADESINAIDU, AGED 51 YEARS, R/ O NEAR GOWARAMMA TEMPLE ANAKAPALLE. SATHAKAMPATTU, GAVARAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3.BODEDA SATYANARAYANA, S/0. LATE PARADESINAIDU AGED 47 YEARS , R/0. D.NO.1-7-37, BHPV POST, PEDDA AKIREDDIPALEM, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4.BODDEDA NOOKA SRIHARI, S/0. LATE PARADESINAIDU AGED 40 YEARS, R/O.D.0.1-737, BHPV POST, PEDDA AKKIREDDIPALE, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARY HOME AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM RURAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, ANAKAPALLi SUB DIVISION, ANAKAPALLI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ANAKAPALLI POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5.SAGI GOPALA RAO, S/0. VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, AGED 65 YEARS, R/0. DOOR.NO. 1-47-9/2, SECTOR-1, MVP COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM-17. 6.IYANAMPUDI SIVAYYA, S/0. VENKATA SURYANARAYANA, AGED 45 YEARS, R/0. D.NO. 19-84, NAIDUTHOTA, VEPAGUNTA, SAI MAD HAVANAGAR, VISAKHAPTNAM-47. 7.PANDIRnN V VIDHYASAGAR, S/0. NAGESWARA RAO, AGED 44 YEARS, R/0. DOOR.NO. 11-2-1, SEA SHEALL APARTMENTS, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATE, 2 FLAT NO. G-14, WALTAIR UPPLANDS, VISAKHAPATNAM-3. 8.NAMBURI TULASIDAS, S/O.LAKSHMANASWAMY, AGED 49 YEARS, R/0. D.No.38-23-34, OPP.R AND B, NH-5, MARRIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM-18. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.2 to 4 in not granting police protection to implement the permanent injunction granted in 0.S.No.105 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District under Judgement and Decree dated 27.9.2019 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and to consequently direct the respondents No.2 to 4 to provide police protection for implementation Judgement and Decree dated 27.9.2019 passed in O.S.‘No.105 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.VVSATISH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME (TG) 2.BALA MURALI KRISHNA P The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioners seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: " to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.2 to 4 in not granting police protection to implement the permanent injunction granted in O.S.No.105 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District under Judgement and Decree dated 27.9.2019 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and to consequently direct the respondents No.2 to 4 to provide police protection for implementation Judgement and Decree dated 27.9.2019 passed in O.S.No.105 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District and to pass such ...." I Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State and learned counsel appearing for respondents 5 to 8. Perused the material on record. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that Petitioners have filed a civil suit for permanent injunction and obtained a decree in their favour in OS No. 105 of 2009 on the file of the Court I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam. On the other hand, learned counsel for respondents 5 to 8 would submit against the order of the Civil Court passed in favour of the Petitioners, respondents 5 to 8 preferred an appeal suit and obtained stay of Judgment and Decree passed in the Civil Suit and the appeal suit is pending on the file of the Court of X Additional District and Sessions Judge, Anakapalle, for consideration. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Court there are civil disputes pending between the parties and that this Court may pass appropriate orders. As can be seen from the material placed on record, civil cases are pending between the parties before competent Civil Courts. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Parties are at liberty to work out their remedies before competent Civil Courts according to law, where the cases are pending. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR C^O^FFICER //TRUE COPY// SE To. 1. The Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariate, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam District. 3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Anakapalli Sub-Division, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District. 4. The Station House Officer, Anakapalli police Station, Visakhapatnam District. 5. OneCCto SRI. VV SATISH Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME (TG) High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 7. One CC to SRI. BALA MURALI KRISHNA P Advocate [OPUC] 8. Two CD Copies r vna HIGH COURT DATED:08/09/2025 ORDER WP NO. 3680 OF 2022 5( 2« SEP 2025 o>? ysCjinrent ''^Sscsisfl^/ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS