HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 1667 of 2023 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. 1. Sri Anoop Bhaiya Lal Shukla, learned counsel for revisionist and Sri Vijay Bahadur Maurya, learned AGA for the State are present. However, none present on behalf of opposite party no.2 even in the revised call. 2. The instant revision has been filed by the revisionist with a prayer to set aside the ex-parte judgment and order dated 05.04.2023 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Jaunpur in Misc. Case No. 1029 of 2022 (Smt. Aasma Vs. Rashid), under Section 125 Cr.P.C. whereby opposite party no.2 has been awarded Rs. 4,000/- per month from the date of application. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for revisionist submits, revisionist is husband of opposite party no.2 and dispute between both the parties have been amicably settled, therefore, instant revision may be dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Learned AGA is having no objection. 5. In view of above, the instant revision stands dismissed as withdrawn. September 12, 2025 AK Pandey Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Anoop Bhaiya Lal Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Amar Singh Yadav, G.A., Mohammed Iftekhar, Sarphraj (Sameer Jain,J.) Rashid .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad