Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6220 (KAR)

GUDDAPPA S/O HANUMANTHAPPA PETAPPANAVAR v. SRI BALACHANDRA S/O SHIVARAM MULE

MFA/103955/2022 · 2025-02-13

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 103955 OF 2022 (ECA) BETWEEN 1 . GUDDAPPA S/O HANUMANTHAPPA PETAPPANAVAR AGE. 33 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, R/O. CHATRA VILLAGE TQ. BYADGI, DIST. HAVERI ... APPELLANT (By SRI : CHANDRASHEKHAR M HOSAMANI) AND 1 . SRI BALACHANDRA S/O SHIVARAM MULE AGE. 40 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS AND CONTRACTOR, R/O. CHATRA VILLAGE TQ. BYADGI, DIST. HAVERI-581111 2 . THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD., A M ARACADA, NEAR C G HOSPITAL ROAD, VIDYARTHI BHAVAN DAVANAGERE-577001 INSURER OF TIPPER LORRY BEARING REG. NO. RJ-06/G-2435. POLICY NO.151003/05/07/00003507. VALID FROM. 13.03.2006 TO 12.03.2007. …RESPONDENTS * * * * * 2 This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed Under Section 30(1) of Employees Compensation Act, 1923, against the Judgment and Award dated 17.04.2021 passed in ECA No.193/2014 on the file of The III Additional Senior Civil Judge and Addl. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ranebennur. This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Hon’ble Court passed the following; O R D E R Three weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections. Failing to do so, appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Bench. SD/- JUDGE //COPY// As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 29.03.2025, the Advocate for appellant has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this MFA No. 103955 of 2022 stands dismissed as per the Court order dated 13.02.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. T By: vg C By: vk