257(2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH CRM-M-29573-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.07.2025 DEEPAK ALIAS BHOLU AND OTHERS …Petitioners V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Monu Sachdeva, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, AAG Haryana. Mr. Rahul Noori, Advocate for respondents No. 2 to 7. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS seeking quashing of FIR No.96 dated 15.03.2025 registered under Sections 191(3), 190, 115, 333, 324(4), 324(5), 351(2), 351(3) of BNS, 2023 and Section 25(1- B)(a) of Arms Act, 1958 at Police Station Badshahpur, Gurugram District Gurugram, along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 28.03.2025 (Annexure P-2). 2. The following order was passed on 28.05.2025: “This petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS seeking quashing of FIR No.96 dated 15.03.2025 registered under Sections 191(3), 190, 115, 333, 324(4), 324(5), 351(2), 351(3) of BNS, 2023 and Section 25(1-B)(a) of Arms Act, 1958 at Police Station Badshahpur, Gurugram District Gurugram, on the basis of compromise dated 28.03.2025 (Annexure P-2) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom. Notice of motion for 11.07.2025. At this stage, on asking of the Court, Ms. Geeta Sharma, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1 – State and Mr. Rahul Noorie, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.2 to 7 and files Memorandum of Appearance, which is taken on record. Copy of the paper book be supplied to them during the course of day. Service is complete. AJAY GOSWAMI 2025.07.14 18:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-29573-2025 (O&M) -2- In the meanwhile, the parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within two weeks from today or any other date convenient to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, to get their statements recorded regarding compromise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of compromise and also to intimate whether any PO proceedings are pending against any of the party on or before the date fixed i.e. 11.07.2025. A copy of the order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate through fax for compliance.” 3. In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from anyone. 4. In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another, (2014) 6 SCC 466 and Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 and Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, this petition is allowed and FIR No.96 dated 15.03.2025 registered under Sections 191(3), 190, 115, 333, 324(4), 324(5), 351(2), 351(3) of BNS, 2023 and Section 25(1-B)(a) of Arms Act, 1958 at Police Station Badshahpur, Gurugram District Gurugram along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed, qua the petitioners. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) 11.07.2025 JUDGE Ajay Goswami Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No AJAY GOSWAMI 2025.07.14 18:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document