Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62181 (ALL)

BABLOO RAJPOOT @ MAHENDRA SINGH v. State of U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/15731/2024 · 2025-08-19

Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:142929 Court No. - 89 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 15731 of 2024 Applicant :- Babloo Rajpoot @ Mahendra Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ruchita Jain Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ruksana Hon'ble Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J. 1. The case is taken up on mentioning. 2. Heard Ms. Ruchita Jain, learned counsel for the applicant, Ms. Saziya Parveen, Advocate, holding brief of Ms. Ruksana, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Sri O. P. Singh, learned AGA for the State-opposite party no.1. 3. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred with prayer to quash the entire proceeding of Sessions Trial No.31 of 2021(State Vs. Babloo Rajpoot @ Mahendra Singh), pending before the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.2, Jhansi, under sections 147, 148, 149, 308, 324, 504, 506, IPC, arising out of Case Crime No.58 of 2020, Police Station Kotwali, District Jhansi, on the basis of compromise. 4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise sent by the court concerned is already on the record. Learned counsel for the applicant further prays that in view of the compromise entered into between the applicant and opposite party no.2, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant. 6. In view of the fact that applicant and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromised and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise sent by the court concerned is already on the record and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicant. 7. In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceeding of Sessions Trial No.31 of 2021(State Vs. Babloo Rajpoot @ Mahendra Singh), pending before the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.2, Jhansi, under sections 147, 148, 149, 308, 324, 504, 506, IPC, arising out of Case Crime No.58 of 2020, Police Station Kotwali, District Jhansi, are hereby quashed. 8. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed. Order Date :- 20.8.2025 VKG Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad