Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62180 (ALL)

DEVI PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/7266/2025 · 2025-05-21

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:86415 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7266 of 2025 Petitioner :- Devi Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Bind Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kaushlesh Pratap Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. Sri Anil Kumar Bind, learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for sometime fairly submits that there are errors in the affidavit of deponent since it has been filed by the petitioner's close friend's son. However, he submits that ignoring the defects made in the affidavit, this writ petition may be disposed of with an observation that representation filed by the petitioner which is annexed along with this writ petition may be considered in accordance with law. 2. Sri Mohit Dixit holding brief of Sri K.P.Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 to 4 submitted that claim of the petitioner was earlier considered and pension was refixed vide order dated 10.2.2025 and in case petitioner is still aggrieved further he has to challenge the said order or to file a detail representation stating the objections if any, however, none of the option has been adopted. 3. In the aforesaid circumstances, ignoring the defects made in the affidavit and putting the deponent on caution that he will be careful while submitting affidavit before this Court, this writ petition is disposed of with aforesaid liberty i.e. either to challenge the order dated 10.2.2025 to some extent or to file fresh representation. Order Date :- 22.5.2025 SB Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad