IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 84 of 2018 Decided on: 27.03.2025 Sunil Kumar. .…Petitioner. Versus Shankar Dass and Ors. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Atul Jhingan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Sunny Modgil, Advocate. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral) CMP No. 26329 of 2024 Application is allowed. The document annexed therewith is taken on record. Application stands disposed of. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2019:HHC:11627 ) CMPMO No. 84 of 2018 In view of the development that has taken place during the pendency of the petition i.e. the land stands demarcated by Tehsildar, Amb, District Una, H.P., who has submitted his report dated 24.05.2023, nothing survives in this petition and the same is rendered infructuous. 2. Consequently, the instant petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 3. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) 27th March, 2025 Judge (sushma)