Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6214 (CHH)

SMT. PRATIMA SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/617/2022 · 2025-03-03

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:10408 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 617 of 2022 1. Smt. Pratima Sahu W/o Shri Kishore Kumar Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Datrenga, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through its Collector Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2. Sub Divisional Officer Dharsiwa, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Tahsildar Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4. Gram Panchayat Datrenga Block Dharsiwa, District Raipur Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Gram Panchayat Datrenga, Block Dharsiwa, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 5. Manish Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Kishan Lal Sahu R/o Village Datrenga, Murra Road, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents Cause title is taken from the Case Information System For Petitioner : Shri C.R. Sahu, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.4 : Shri Ramesh Nayak, Advocate Order on Board By Bibhu Datta Guru, J. 3/3/2025 1. By the present petition, the petitioner is questioning the notice dated 8-12- 2021 issued by the Gram Panchayat Datrenga, Block Dharsiwa, District Raipur. 2 2. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.4 would submit that the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable against the notice issued by the Gram Panchayat whereas the petitioner can avail the remedy under Section 91 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 19931. 3. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the documents. 4. Having considered the entire facts situation of the case and particularly considering the fact that there is an alternative remedy under Section 91 of the Adhiniyam, 1993, the present petition is disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to avail the remedy as may be available to her within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the petitioner files an appeal along with an application for grant of interim relief, if any, within the stipulated period, till decision of the said interim application by the appellate authority, the interim order dated 2-2-2022 passed by this Court shall remain operative. 5. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Gowri 1 for the short ‘the Adhiniyam, 1993’ K GOWRI SANKARA RAO Digitally signed by K GOWRI SANKARA RAO Date: 2025.03.04 10:33:13 +0530