Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:MHC:1872 W.A.No.1756 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05.08.2025
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR W.A.No. 1756 of 2025 1.Meenachi 2.K.R.Palanisamy .. Appellants vs 1.The District Collector, Collectorate Building, Coimbatore – 641 018. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Building, Coimbatore – 641 018. 3.The District Revenue Officer (Special), Airport Expansion, District Collector Office, Coimbatore – 641 018. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Coimbatore North, Revenue Division, Coimbatore. 5.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Coimbatore North, Coimbatore – 641 029. 6.The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.1756 of 2025 Coimbatore North, Coimbatore – 641 029. 7.Premkumar 8.Duraisamy 9.Thirumoorthy 10.Kandhamani .. Respondents Prayer : Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against order dated 30.01.2025 made in W.P.No. 36721 of 2024. For Appellant : Mr.Ravindran Venkatachalapathy For Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran, Special Government Pleader for R1 to R6 Mr.P.Rajendran for Mr.P.Shrisanthaji for R7 to R10
JUDGMENT (Delivered by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH.,J) We find no justification whatsoever for the present writ appeal. The learned Judge has under the impugned order dated 30.01.2025 considered the case of the parties relegating the petitioners to approach the DRO by way of appeal and we find no infirmity in this direction. Directions have been given in paragraph 8 for the time frame for disposal 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.1756 of 2025 of appeal as well.
2. Incidentally, the writ petition had originally been filed challenging only the order of the Zonal Deputy Tahsildar dated
22.02.2023. Even prior to the institution of the writ petition the petitioner, had challenged the order of the Tahsildar also by way of statutory appeal before the RDO, riding two horses simultaneously. Pending writ petition, the appeals filed before the RDO came to be disposed and the prayer was consequently amended.
3. Dismissed with no order as to costs.
[A.S.M., J] [N.S., J]
05.08.2025 Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes ssm To 1.The District Collector, Collectorate Building, Coimbatore – 641 018. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Building, Coimbatore – 641 018. 3.The District Revenue Officer (Special), Airport Expansion, District Collector Office, 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.1756 of 2025 Coimbatore – 641 018. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Coimbatore North, Revenue Division, Coimbatore. 5.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Coimbatore North, Coimbatore – 641 029. 6.The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, Coimbatore North, Coimbatore – 641 029. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.1756 of 2025 DR. ANITA SUMANTH, J. and N.SENTHILKUMAR, J. ssm W.A.No.1756 of 2025 05.08.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis