Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6212 (AP)

ONTERU MANJULA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/2605/2019 · 2025-03-10

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010056862019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Onteru Manjula The State Of A.P and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K RATHANGA PANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G SESHADRI(SC FOR MPP ZPP) 2. N B CHANDRA SEKHAR 3. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER:- The instant Writ Petition is filed India for the following relief: “to issue a Writ of Mandamus orders/resolution No.19/2019 of the 4 removing the petitioner as Village Organization Assistant of Thoderu Village group 3, Podalkur Mandal IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2605 OF 2019 AND and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: K RATHANGA PANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): G SESHADRI(SC FOR MPP ZPP) N B CHANDRA SEKHAR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned 19/2019 of the 4th respondent dated 18. removing the petitioner as Village Organization Assistant of Thoderu Village Podalkur Mandal, SPS Nellore District, without authority of law and IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396] THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) under Article 226 of the Constitution of e impugned respondent dated 18.02.2019 in removing the petitioner as Village Organization Assistant of Thoderu Village without authority of law and jurisdiction by way of colorable exercise of power as illegal, arbitrary and consequently set aside the aforesaid impugned orders of the 4th respondent dated 18.02.2019 and pass such other orders”. 2. Heard Sri K. Rathangapani Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that no further orders are required in this matter. 4. In the light of the submissions referred supra, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 5. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 10.03.2025 KK