Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6209 (UTT)

MUSSOORIE DEHRADUN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MDDA v. VINOD KUMAR GUPTA

CLR/43/2025 · 2025-05-14

Alok Kumar Verma

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:3865 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 14.05. 2025 CLR No.43 of 2025 Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J. An Application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was filed in Original Suit No. 12 of 2018, “Vinod Kumar Gupta vs. State of Uttarakhand and Others”. The said application was allowed on 14.08.2024 and the plaint was rejected. A Civil Appeal (Civil Appeal No.18 of 2024) was filed against the said order dated 14.08.2024. The said Appeal has been allowed vide impugned judgment dated 03.12.2024. 2. Heard Mr. Rahul Consul, learned counsel for the proposed revisionist, Mr. K.S. Mehta, learned Additional C.S.C. assisted by Mr. I.P. Kohli, learned Brief Holder for the respondent nos.2 to 6 and Mr. Vikas Bahuguna, learned counsel for 2025:UHC:3865 the respondent no.7. 3. Learned counsel for the proposed revisionist on instruction has requested to permit the revisionist to withdraw the proposed revision to file an appeal under Clause (u) of Rule 1 of Order XLIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. 4. The said request has not been opposed by the respondents. 5. The proposed Revision is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the proposed revisionist to file an appeal, as prayed, but in accordance with law. (Alok Kumar Verma, J.) 14.05.2025 Pant/