Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Kerala · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6209 (KER)

SHAILESH T.M. v. STATE OF KERALA

Bail Appl./4432/2025 · 2025-04-04

P V Kunhikrishnan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

B.A.No.4432 of 2025 1 2025:KER:29474 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1947 BAIL APPL. NO. 4432 OF 2025 CRIME NO.1334/2021 OF THRIKKAKARA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM PETITIONER(S)/THIRD ACCUSED: SHAILESH T.M. AGED 39 YEARS ,S/O. MOHANAN T.B., THEVALIL VEEDU, PULLATT VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR, PIN - 680664 BY ADVS. SREEJITH S. NAIR SASTHAMANGALAM S. AJITHKUMAR (SR.) SATHEESH MOHANAN SEKHAR G. THAMPI MAHIMA RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 BY ADV. SR PP - HRITHWIK C S THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: B.A.No.4432 of 2025 2 2025:KER:29474 P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J -------------------------------- B.A.No.4432 of 2025 ------------------------------- Dated this the 04th day of April, 2025 O R D E R When this bail application came up for consideration, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the arrest of the petitioner is not necessary in Crime No.70/CB/ALP/R/2022 of Crime Branch, Alappuzha (Crime No.1334/2021 of Thrikkakara Police Station, Ernakulam). 2. If that be the case, no further order is necessary in this case. If the arrest of the petitioner is necessary in connection with the above crime, two weeks prior notice should be given to the petitioner before taking any coercive steps. With the above observation, this bail application is disposed of. Sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JUDGE DM