Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62080 (KAR)

SHILPA D/O SRI GOVIND G v. THE REGIONAL COMMISSIONER

WP/101782/2024 · 2025-09-24

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13087 WP No. 101782 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 101782 OF 2024 (LB-ELE) BETWEEN: SHILPA D/O SRI GOVIND G., AGE. 30 YEARS, OCC. CORPORATOR, BALLARI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, R/O. 32ND WARD, HOSAPETE ROAD, NAGALAKERE, COWL BAZAAR, BALLARI, TQ. AND DIST. BALLARI 583101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. G.I. GACHCHINAMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE REGIONAL COMMISSIONER, KALBURGI DIVISION, KALBURGI, DIST. KALBURGI 585101. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BALLARI, DIST. BALLARI 583101. 3. THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BALLARI, DIST. BALLARI 583101. 4. THE COMMISSIONER, BALLARI CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BALLARI, DIST. BALLARI 583101. 5. THE RETURNING OFFICER FOR THE ELECTIONS TO THE POST OF MAYOR BALLARI CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BALLARI, DIST. BALLARI 583101. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED 28-11-2023 BEARING NO.Kam/Pra.A.Ka./Chunavane/18/2023-24 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE- E AND ALSO IMPUGNED PUBLICATION DATED 28-11-2023 BEARING Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13087 WP No. 101782 of 2024 NO.Kam/Pra.A.Ka./Chunavane/18/2023-24 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-F SO FAR IT RELATES TO THE OBSERVATIONS THAT THE ELECTIONS TO THE POST OF MAYOR OF BALLARI CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION TO BE HELD FROM THE STAGE WHERE IT WAS STOPPED & ETC. THIS WP COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. Despite the order dated 10.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with. 2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE AM, CT:VP LIST NO.: 3 SL NO.: 36