DEEPAK SURYAPRAKASH BHIOGADE v. STATE OF MAHA., THR. PRINCIPAL SECY., DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION, MUMBAI AND ORS.
WP/7727/2025 · 2025-12-08
Shri Anil S Kilor, Shri Rajnish R Vyas
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 62074 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 62074 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 137wp7698.2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 7698 OF 2025 Bharti Kishor Porshaarthi (PB Natthuram) Vs State of Maharashtra, and others. AND WRIT PETITION NO. 7739 OF 2025 Priya W/o Mukul Vaidya (Priya P. Narad) Vs State of Maharashtra and others. AND WRIT PETITION NO. 7727 OF 2025 Deepak Suryaprakash Bhiogade Vs State of Maharashtra and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Ms. Sandhya N. Maniyar, counsel for petitioners in all the petitions. Mr. P.P. Pendke, AGP for respondent No. 1./State.(W.P. 7698 of 2025) Mr. D.P. Thakare, Addl. G.P. for respondent No.1/State (W.P. 7739 of 2025) Mr. N.R.Patil, AGP for respondent No.1/State (W.P. 7727 of 2025)
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR and RAJNISH R. VYAS, JJ. DATE : 08/12/2025.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. In all these petitions, the prayer is to direct the respondents to implement the recommendation of 6th and 7th Pay Commissions. According to the petitioners, the same issue is still not decided.
3. Be that as it may, the same issue can be decided by respondent Nos. 2 and 3. We direct the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to treat the present petitions as representations and to decide the same within a period of twelve weeks from the receipt of this order.
4. In view of the above, the writ petitions are disposed of accordingly.
( RAJNISH R. VYAS, J.) (ANIL S. KILOR, J.) rkn 2025:BHC-NAG:13833-DB