Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6207 (CAL)

PIJUS PATRA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA(P)/16/2023 · 2025-08-08

Smita Das De, Sujoy Paul

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

8th August, 2025 Item no. DL 31 Court No. 08 Asraf, A.R.(Ct.) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Case No. WPA(P) 16 of 2023 In the matter of : PIJUS PATRA …. Petitioner VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. ….Respondents For the Petitioner : Mr. Bikram Banerjee Mr. Sudipta Dasgupta Mr. Sutirtha Nayek ….Advocates For the Respondents / State : Mr. Samrat Sen, AAAG Mr. Amitabrata Roy, GP Mr. Nilotpal Chatterjee, JGA Mr. Amrita Lal Chatterjee Mr. Suddhadev Adak ….Advocates 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the decision to appoint temporary homeguards by the order dated 30th December, 2022 (page 29) is bad in law and runs contrary to the statutory provisions, namely, West Bengal Homeguards (Enrollment) Rules, 2018 published in West Bengal Police Gazette on 21st June, 2019. 2. It is seen that the order dated 30th December, 2022 makes it clear that appointments were made for the period from 01.01.2023 to 30.06.2023. There is no iota of material before us to show that such appointments were continued beyond 30th June, Page 2 2023. The issue to be considered in this petition for the present is academic in nature. 3. We find no reason to keep this PIL pending. The writ petition / PIL is disposed of by reserving liberty to the petitioner to raise the grounds in appropriate proceedings, if occasion arises. ( Sujoy Paul, J. ) ( Smita Das De, J.)